The kingdom of God distinction of analytic/synthetic philosophy

The Kingdom of God as a philosophy analytic/synthetic distinction

By William Huynh, BA

There are two main ways to view philosophy as an analytical science. The same causal case could be made for theological studies, and in this paper I defend such a cause.

Firstly, there is a synthetical view of theological knowledge. It requires the epistemology of a view of knowledge in disturbed and self evident. This could be true in theology; but the fact that it is not manufactured, or made by a synthetic process means that it is usually or always not synthetic. For example, the Holy Trinity is pre-supposed to be the three distinct qualities of God. Furthermore, there is a God. Therefore, it cannot remain distinctive that there is a synthetic quality of God.

Now there is an analytical process by which theology is present. It is per summa, meaning it is manifested. That is true because it is a process of meaning. Therefore when one gives meaning to a process, there is an analytical solution to heterodox and heterozygous theology. For example, theology is important. It has a real nature to its study and development. That would leave room for the catechism, and its development. The catechism, to some degree or another, relies on a analytical framework of knowledge.